Compensation Plan Design · Glossary

Commission Threshold

What is a commission threshold?

A commission threshold — also called a payout floor — is the minimum level of quota attainment a sales rep must reach before any commission is paid. Below the floor, the rep earns no commission at all, regardless of how much revenue they actually closed. Once attainment crosses the floor, commission begins to accrue according to the plan's rates.

It is one of the most emotionally charged terms in all of sales compensation, and for a concrete reason: it is the exact line between a commission check and nothing. A rep who books $199,999 against a $200,000 quota under a 100% floor earns zero commission — a single dollar short of a payout. That cliff is why the term shows up constantly in sales forums, usually phrased as some version of "I closed almost my whole number and got paid nothing."

How a commission threshold works: an example

Consider a rep, Maya, with a $200,000 quarterly quota, an 8% commission rate, and a threshold set at 80% attainment:

Revenue closed Attainment Relative to 80% floor Commission
$140,000 70% Below the floor $0 — nothing paid
$159,999 ~80% Just under the floor $0 — still nothing
$160,000 80% Floor reached Commission begins
$200,000 100% Well above the floor Full commission on attained revenue

What this means?

The threshold turns attainment into a pass/fail gate at the bottom of the plan. Everything Maya closes below 80% earns nothing; the moment she crosses it, the plan starts paying. Whether the threshold is a hard cliff (commission on all attained revenue once you cross) or a gate (commission only on revenue above the threshold) is a plan-design choice that dramatically changes the payout — and one reps frequently misread. The single most important thing to find in your own plan is the threshold percentage and how commission is calculated once you clear it.

Commission threshold vs non-recoverable draw

These two get confused constantly, because in a weak period both can leave a rep with "just base pay." But they are opposites in mechanism. A commission threshold withholds commission until a minimum attainment is reached — it is a gate on earning. A non-recoverable draw guarantees the rep a minimum income that is never clawed back — it is a floor on take-home pay, not a gate on commission. One decides whether you earn commission at all; the other guarantees income regardless of whether you do. A plan can even use both: a draw guaranteeing income while a floor gates commission.

Why companies use commission thresholds

A floor concentrates commission spend on performance that actually matters and avoids paying meaningful commission for results far below plan. It can also discourage coasting and protect the commission budget from being drained by a team that collectively underperforms. Used well, it sets a clear expectation: commission is a reward for reaching a real level of production, not for showing up.

The risk is entirely about where the floor is set. A floor at 80% is a reasonable expectation; a floor at 100% creates the demoralizing cliff where a rep who closed 99% of quota earns nothing — the exact scenario that fills sales forums with frustration and drives early attrition. The floor is a morale lever as much as a financial one, which is why the number is worth setting deliberately rather than by default.

Common commission threshold mistakes

1. Setting the floor at 100%:

A floor equal to full quota means anything short of a perfect number pays zero. It reads as punitive, and it punishes reps for near-misses that are often outside their control.

2. Not clarifying how commission is calculated above the floor:

Reps need to know whether crossing the floor pays commission on all attained revenue or only on revenue above the floor. Ambiguity here is a direct route to a payout dispute.

3. Confusing the floor with a draw:

Treating a commission threshold and a non-recoverable draw as the same thing produces plans a rep cannot reconcile, since one gates commission and the other guarantees income.

How Visdum handles commission thresholds

A commission threshold is simple to state and surprisingly easy to get wrong by hand, because it interacts with attainment, proration, and crediting rules that all live in different places. In Visdum, the floor is a plan setting tied to real-time attainment: reps see exactly where they stand against the floor and how close they are to clearing it before the period closes, which turns the cliff from a nasty surprise into a visible target. The calculation applies the floor consistently — hard cliff or gated, as the plan specifies — so the commission a rep sees is the commission the plan pays, and the "I closed almost my whole number, why did I get nothing" conversation is answered by a transparent statement rather than a dispute. Finance gets floor logic applied uniformly across the team without a spreadsheet of manual exceptions.

Take a self-guided product tour → to see attainment thresholds and floor logic in action, or read how to build a SaaS sales compensation plan.

Related terms

Quota Attainment · Draw Against Commission · Accelerator · OTE · Quota

‍

On this page
Example

Calculate your OTE in 30 seconds

Enter your base, quota, and commission rate. Get your projected OTE plus earnings at common attainment scenarios.
Open the OTE calculator →

Frequently asked questions

What is a commission threshold?

A commission threshold — also called a payout floor, is the minimum level of quota attainment a sales rep must reach before any commission is paid. Below that floor, the rep earns no commission regardless of the revenue they closed. Once attainment crosses the floor, commission begins to accrue according to the plan's rates.

What is the difference between a payout floor and a commission threshold?

They are the same mechanic under two names. A payout floor and a commission threshold both describe the minimum attainment a rep must hit before commission is earned. Some plans phrase it as a floor the rep rises above; others as a threshold the rep crosses. Either way, the rep earns zero commission below the line and begins earning above it.

Can you give an example of a commission threshold?

Consider a rep with a $200,000 quota and a commission threshold? set at 100%. If they close $199,999, they are just below the floor and earn no commission at all, despite booking nearly the full quota. Close one more dollar to hit $200,000, and commission begins. That cliff is why commission thresholds are one of the most debated terms in sales compensation.

What is the difference between a commission threshold and a non-recoverable draw?

They are often confused because both can mean a rep receives no extra money in a weak period. But they differ: a commission threshold? withholds commission until a minimum attainment is reached, while a non-recoverable draw pays the rep a guaranteed advance that is never clawed back. A floor is a gate on earning; a draw is a guaranteed income even when earning is low.

Why do companies use commission thresholds?

Companies use them to focus commission spend on meaningful performance and avoid paying for results far below plan. A floor also discourages coasting and can protect the commission budget. The risk is morale: a floor set too high creates a demotivating cliff where a rep who nearly hit quota earns nothing, which is a frequent source of frustration and attrition.

What is the difference between a commission threshold and a commission cap?

A commission threshold is the minimum attainment needed to earn any commission; a cap is the maximum commission a rep can earn no matter how far past quota they go. The floor sits at the bottom of the plan and the cap at the top. A plan can have a floor, a cap, both, or neither, and each shapes rep behavior differently.

Related terms in Compensation Plan Design

Concepts you'll encounter alongside OTE when designing or interpreting a sales comp plan.
MBO (Management by Objectives)
In sales compensation, an MBO (Management by Objectives) is variable pay tied to specific qualitative or non-revenue goals rather than to a revenue quota — think onboarding completion, pipeline coverage, or a strategic project. It is how companies reward outcomes that matter but are not captured by a commission rate, and it is especially common for CSMs and SDRs whose impact on revenue is indirect. It is distinct from the broader management theory of the same name.
Shadow Accounting
Shadow accounting is when sales reps keep their own parallel commission spreadsheets because they do not trust the company's official numbers. It is a symptom, not a habit — reps only rebuild the math when they cannot see how their commission was calculated. The hidden cost is real: every hour a rep spends checking their own pay is an hour not selling, and across a team that adds up to a significant monthly burn.
Commission Reconciliation
Commission reconciliation is the end-of-period process of verifying that the commission a system calculated matches the CRM deal data it was based on, matches the finance team's accruals, and matches what payroll actually disbursed. When those figures agree, reps are paid correctly and the books are clean; when they diverge, the gap has to be found and fixed before payout. It is the single biggest source of commission disputes, and no competitor glossary defines it as a standalone term.
Bookings vs Collections
Commission vs Bonus
TL;DR: Commission and bonus are often used interchangeably, but they are legally and mechanically different. Commission is earnings tied directly to a closed deal — usually a percentage of its value — and in many US states earned commission is protected wages that cannot be withheld without cause. A bonus is a discretionary, often one-time payment not tied to a specific deal, which an employer can generally set, adjust, or withhold. The distinction matters most for disputes, clawbacks, and taxes.
Effective Commission Rate
The effective commission rate is the actual rate a rep earned, calculated as total commission paid divided by total revenue booked — as opposed to the stated rate written in the comp plan. Because accelerators, decelerators, draws, clawbacks, and payout floors all modify the final payout, the effective rate almost never equals the stated rate. It is the single number that tells finance what commission actually costs per dollar of revenue, and it is defined in no competitor glossary.